Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem trlres

Description: The restriction <. H , Q >. of a trail <. F , P >. to an initial segment of the trail (of length N ) forms a trail on the subgraph S consisting of the edges in the initial segment. (Contributed by AV, 6-Mar-2021) Hypothesis revised using the prefix operation. (Revised by AV, 30-Nov-2022)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses trlres.v ⊢ 𝑉 = ( Vtx ‘ 𝐺 )
trlres.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( iEdg ‘ 𝐺 )
trlres.d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 ( Trails ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 )
trlres.n ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ( 0 ..^ ( ♯ ‘ 𝐹 ) ) )
trlres.h ⊢ 𝐻 = ( 𝐹 prefix 𝑁 )
trlres.s ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( Vtx ‘ 𝑆 ) = 𝑉 )
trlres.e ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( iEdg ‘ 𝑆 ) = ( 𝐼 ↾ ( 𝐹 “ ( 0 ..^ 𝑁 ) ) ) )
trlres.q ⊢ 𝑄 = ( 𝑃 ↾ ( 0 ... 𝑁 ) )
Assertion trlres ( 𝜑 → 𝐻 ( Trails ‘ 𝑆 ) 𝑄 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 trlres.v ⊢ 𝑉 = ( Vtx ‘ 𝐺 )
2 trlres.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( iEdg ‘ 𝐺 )
3 trlres.d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 ( Trails ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 )
4 trlres.n ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ( 0 ..^ ( ♯ ‘ 𝐹 ) ) )
5 trlres.h ⊢ 𝐻 = ( 𝐹 prefix 𝑁 )
6 trlres.s ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( Vtx ‘ 𝑆 ) = 𝑉 )
7 trlres.e ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( iEdg ‘ 𝑆 ) = ( 𝐼 ↾ ( 𝐹 “ ( 0 ..^ 𝑁 ) ) ) )
8 trlres.q ⊢ 𝑄 = ( 𝑃 ↾ ( 0 ... 𝑁 ) )
9 trliswlk ⊢ ( 𝐹 ( Trails ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 → 𝐹 ( Walks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 )
10 3 9 syl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 ( Walks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 )
11 1 2 10 4 6 7 5 8 wlkres ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐻 ( Walks ‘ 𝑆 ) 𝑄 )
12 1 2 3 4 5 trlreslem ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐻 : ( 0 ..^ ( ♯ ‘ 𝐻 ) ) –1-1-onto→ dom ( 𝐼 ↾ ( 𝐹 “ ( 0 ..^ 𝑁 ) ) ) )
13 f1of1 ⊢ ( 𝐻 : ( 0 ..^ ( ♯ ‘ 𝐻 ) ) –1-1-onto→ dom ( 𝐼 ↾ ( 𝐹 “ ( 0 ..^ 𝑁 ) ) ) → 𝐻 : ( 0 ..^ ( ♯ ‘ 𝐻 ) ) –1-1→ dom ( 𝐼 ↾ ( 𝐹 “ ( 0 ..^ 𝑁 ) ) ) )
14 df-f1 ⊢ ( 𝐻 : ( 0 ..^ ( ♯ ‘ 𝐻 ) ) –1-1→ dom ( 𝐼 ↾ ( 𝐹 “ ( 0 ..^ 𝑁 ) ) ) ↔ ( 𝐻 : ( 0 ..^ ( ♯ ‘ 𝐻 ) ) ⟶ dom ( 𝐼 ↾ ( 𝐹 “ ( 0 ..^ 𝑁 ) ) ) ∧ Fun ◡ 𝐻 ) )
15 14 simprbi ⊢ ( 𝐻 : ( 0 ..^ ( ♯ ‘ 𝐻 ) ) –1-1→ dom ( 𝐼 ↾ ( 𝐹 “ ( 0 ..^ 𝑁 ) ) ) → Fun ◡ 𝐻 )
16 12 13 15 3syl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → Fun ◡ 𝐻 )
17 istrl ⊢ ( 𝐻 ( Trails ‘ 𝑆 ) 𝑄 ↔ ( 𝐻 ( Walks ‘ 𝑆 ) 𝑄 ∧ Fun ◡ 𝐻 ) )
18 11 16 17 sylanbrc ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐻 ( Trails ‘ 𝑆 ) 𝑄 )