Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem vtoclgft

Description: Closed theorem form of vtoclgf . The reverse implication is proven in ceqsal1t . See ceqsalt for a version with x and A disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2013) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016) (Proof shortened by JJ, 11-Aug-2021) Avoid ax-13 . (Revised by GG, 6-Oct-2023)

Ref Expression
Assertion vtoclgft ( ( ( 𝑥 𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 ) ∧ ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) ∧ 𝐴𝑉 ) → 𝜓 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 biimp ( ( 𝜑𝜓 ) → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) )
2 1 imim2i ( ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) → ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) )
3 2 alimi ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) )
4 spcimgft ( ( ( 𝑥 𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) ) → ( 𝐴𝑉 → ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑𝜓 ) ) )
5 3 4 sylan2 ( ( ( 𝑥 𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) ) → ( 𝐴𝑉 → ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑𝜓 ) ) )
6 5 com23 ( ( ( 𝑥 𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) ) → ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → ( 𝐴𝑉𝜓 ) ) )
7 6 impr ( ( ( 𝑥 𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 ) ∧ ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) ) → ( 𝐴𝑉𝜓 ) )
8 7 3impia ( ( ( 𝑥 𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 ) ∧ ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) ∧ 𝐴𝑉 ) → 𝜓 )