Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem wlklnwwlklnupgr2

Description: A walk of length N as word corresponds to the sequence of vertices in a walk of length N in a pseudograph. This variant of wlklnwwlkln2 does not require G to be a simple pseudograph, but it requires (indirectly) the Axiom of Choice. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jul-2018) (Revised by AV, 12-Apr-2021)

Ref Expression
Assertion wlklnwwlklnupgr2 ( 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ( 𝑃 ∈ ( 𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺 ) → ∃ 𝑓 ( 𝑓 ( Walks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 ∧ ( ♯ ‘ 𝑓 ) = 𝑁 ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 wlkiswwlksupgr2 ( 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ( 𝑃 ∈ ( WWalks ‘ 𝐺 ) → ∃ 𝑓 𝑓 ( Walks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 ) )
2 1 wlklnwwlkln2lem ( 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ( 𝑃 ∈ ( 𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺 ) → ∃ 𝑓 ( 𝑓 ( Walks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 ∧ ( ♯ ‘ 𝑓 ) = 𝑁 ) ) )