Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem bj-mpgs

Description: From a closed form theorem (the major premise) with an antecedent in the "strong necessity" modality (in the language of modal logic), deduce the inference |- ph => |- ps . Strong necessity is stronger than necessity, and equivalent to it when sp (modal T) is available. Therefore, this theorem is stronger than mpg when sp is not available. (Contributed by BJ, 1-Nov-2023)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses bj-mpgs.min
|- ph
bj-mpgs.maj
|- ( ( ph /\ A. x ph ) -> ps )
Assertion bj-mpgs
|- ps

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 bj-mpgs.min
 |-  ph
2 bj-mpgs.maj
 |-  ( ( ph /\ A. x ph ) -> ps )
3 1 ax-gen
 |-  A. x ph
4 1 3 2 mp2an
 |-  ps