Description: A -> identity. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 22-Oct-2010) An alternate proof is possible using falim instead of id but the present proof using id emphasizes that the result does not require the principle of explosion. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | falimfal | |- ( ( F. -> F. ) <-> T. ) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | id | |- ( F. -> F. ) |
|
2 | 1 | bitru | |- ( ( F. -> F. ) <-> T. ) |