Description: Deduction adding a consequent to both sides of a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1993) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Sep-2013)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Hypothesis | imbid.1 | |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) |
|
Assertion | imbi1d | |- ( ph -> ( ( ps -> th ) <-> ( ch -> th ) ) ) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | imbid.1 | |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) |
|
2 | 1 | biimprd | |- ( ph -> ( ch -> ps ) ) |
3 | 2 | imim1d | |- ( ph -> ( ( ps -> th ) -> ( ch -> th ) ) ) |
4 | 1 | biimpd | |- ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) ) |
5 | 4 | imim1d | |- ( ph -> ( ( ch -> th ) -> ( ps -> th ) ) ) |
6 | 3 5 | impbid | |- ( ph -> ( ( ps -> th ) <-> ( ch -> th ) ) ) |