Description: The set exponentiation of 2 to the aleph-zero has cardinality of at least aleph-one. (If we were to assume the Continuum Hypothesis, their cardinalities would be the same.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jul-2004)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | aleph1 | ⊢ ( ℵ ‘ 1o ) ≼ ( 2o ↑m ( ℵ ‘ ∅ ) ) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-1o | ⊢ 1o = suc ∅ | |
2 | 1 | fveq2i | ⊢ ( ℵ ‘ 1o ) = ( ℵ ‘ suc ∅ ) |
3 | alephsucpw | ⊢ ( ℵ ‘ suc ∅ ) ≼ 𝒫 ( ℵ ‘ ∅ ) | |
4 | fvex | ⊢ ( ℵ ‘ ∅ ) ∈ V | |
5 | 4 | pw2en | ⊢ 𝒫 ( ℵ ‘ ∅ ) ≈ ( 2o ↑m ( ℵ ‘ ∅ ) ) |
6 | domen2 | ⊢ ( 𝒫 ( ℵ ‘ ∅ ) ≈ ( 2o ↑m ( ℵ ‘ ∅ ) ) → ( ( ℵ ‘ suc ∅ ) ≼ 𝒫 ( ℵ ‘ ∅ ) ↔ ( ℵ ‘ suc ∅ ) ≼ ( 2o ↑m ( ℵ ‘ ∅ ) ) ) ) | |
7 | 5 6 | ax-mp | ⊢ ( ( ℵ ‘ suc ∅ ) ≼ 𝒫 ( ℵ ‘ ∅ ) ↔ ( ℵ ‘ suc ∅ ) ≼ ( 2o ↑m ( ℵ ‘ ∅ ) ) ) |
8 | 3 7 | mpbi | ⊢ ( ℵ ‘ suc ∅ ) ≼ ( 2o ↑m ( ℵ ‘ ∅ ) ) |
9 | 2 8 | eqbrtri | ⊢ ( ℵ ‘ 1o ) ≼ ( 2o ↑m ( ℵ ‘ ∅ ) ) |