Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem mdandyv3

Description: Given the equivalences set in the hypotheses, there exist a proof where ch, th, ta, et match ph, ps accordingly. (Contributed by Jarvin Udandy, 6-Sep-2016)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses mdandyv3.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 ↔ ⊥ )
mdandyv3.2 ⊢ ( 𝜓 ↔ ⊤ )
mdandyv3.3 ⊢ ( 𝜒 ↔ ⊤ )
mdandyv3.4 ⊢ ( 𝜃 ↔ ⊤ )
mdandyv3.5 ⊢ ( 𝜏 ↔ ⊥ )
mdandyv3.6 ⊢ ( 𝜂 ↔ ⊥ )
Assertion mdandyv3 ( ( ( ( 𝜒 ↔ 𝜓 ) ∧ ( 𝜃 ↔ 𝜓 ) ) ∧ ( 𝜏 ↔ 𝜑 ) ) ∧ ( 𝜂 ↔ 𝜑 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 mdandyv3.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 ↔ ⊥ )
2 mdandyv3.2 ⊢ ( 𝜓 ↔ ⊤ )
3 mdandyv3.3 ⊢ ( 𝜒 ↔ ⊤ )
4 mdandyv3.4 ⊢ ( 𝜃 ↔ ⊤ )
5 mdandyv3.5 ⊢ ( 𝜏 ↔ ⊥ )
6 mdandyv3.6 ⊢ ( 𝜂 ↔ ⊥ )
7 3 2 bothtbothsame ⊢ ( 𝜒 ↔ 𝜓 )
8 4 2 bothtbothsame ⊢ ( 𝜃 ↔ 𝜓 )
9 7 8 pm3.2i ⊢ ( ( 𝜒 ↔ 𝜓 ) ∧ ( 𝜃 ↔ 𝜓 ) )
10 5 1 bothfbothsame ⊢ ( 𝜏 ↔ 𝜑 )
11 9 10 pm3.2i ⊢ ( ( ( 𝜒 ↔ 𝜓 ) ∧ ( 𝜃 ↔ 𝜓 ) ) ∧ ( 𝜏 ↔ 𝜑 ) )
12 6 1 bothfbothsame ⊢ ( 𝜂 ↔ 𝜑 )
13 11 12 pm3.2i ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝜒 ↔ 𝜓 ) ∧ ( 𝜃 ↔ 𝜓 ) ) ∧ ( 𝜏 ↔ 𝜑 ) ) ∧ ( 𝜂 ↔ 𝜑 ) )