Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem pm2.61da3ne

Description: Deduction eliminating three inequalities in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2013) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses pm2.61da3ne.1 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ) → 𝜓 )
pm2.61da3ne.2 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ) → 𝜓 )
pm2.61da3ne.3 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐹 ) → 𝜓 )
pm2.61da3ne.4 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹 ) ) → 𝜓 )
Assertion pm2.61da3ne ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 pm2.61da3ne.1 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ) → 𝜓 )
2 pm2.61da3ne.2 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ) → 𝜓 )
3 pm2.61da3ne.3 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐹 ) → 𝜓 )
4 pm2.61da3ne.4 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹 ) ) → 𝜓 )
5 1 a1d ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ) → ( ( 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹 ) → 𝜓 ) )
6 4 3exp2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ( 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 → ( 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹 → 𝜓 ) ) ) )
7 6 imp4b ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ) → ( ( 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹 ) → 𝜓 ) )
8 5 7 pm2.61dane ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹 ) → 𝜓 ) )
9 8 imp ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹 ) ) → 𝜓 )
10 2 3 9 pm2.61da2ne ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 )