Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem ax10w

Description: Weak version of ax-10 from which we can prove any ax-10 instance not involving wff variables or bundling. Uses only Tarski's FOL axiom schemes. It is an alias of hbn1w introduced for labeling consistency. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2017) Use hbn1w instead. (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypothesis ax10w.1
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
Assertion ax10w
|- ( -. A. x ph -> A. x -. A. x ph )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 ax10w.1
 |-  ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
2 1 hbn1w
 |-  ( -. A. x ph -> A. x -. A. x ph )