Description: A weakening of bj-ax12ig that is sufficient to prove a weak form of the axiom of substitution ax-12 . The general statement of which ax12i is an instance. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Sep-2019)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | bj-ax12i.1 | |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) |
|
| bj-ax12i.2 | |- ( ch -> A. x ch ) |
||
| Assertion | bj-ax12i | |- ( ph -> ( ps -> A. x ( ph -> ps ) ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bj-ax12i.1 | |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) |
|
| 2 | bj-ax12i.2 | |- ( ch -> A. x ch ) |
|
| 3 | 2 | a1i | |- ( ph -> ( ch -> A. x ch ) ) |
| 4 | 1 3 | bj-ax12ig | |- ( ph -> ( ps -> A. x ( ph -> ps ) ) ) |