Description: A lemma for substitutions, proved from Tarski's FOL. The version without DV ( x , y ) is true but requires ax-13 . The disjoint variable condition DV ( x , ph ) is necessary for both directions: consider substituting x = z for ph . (Contributed by BJ, 25-May-2021)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | bj-eqs | |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ax-1 | |
|
2 | 1 | alrimiv | |
3 | exim | |
|
4 | ax6ev | |
|
5 | pm2.27 | |
|
6 | 4 5 | ax-mp | |
7 | ax5e | |
|
8 | 3 6 7 | 3syl | |
9 | 2 8 | impbii | |