Description: The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 ) using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. It was completed manually, but has the potential to be completed automatically by a tools program which would invoke Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sspwimp is sspwimpVD without virtual deductions and was derived from sspwimpVD . (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | |- (. A C_ B ->. A C_ B ). |
| 2:: | |- (. .............. x e. ~P A ->. x e. ~P A ). |
| 3:2: | |- (. .............. x e. ~P A ->. x C_ A ). |
| 4:3,1: | |- (. (. A C_ B ,. x e. ~P A ). ->. x C_ B ). |
| 5:: | |- x e.V |
| 6:4,5: | |- (. (. A C B ,. x e. ~P A ). ->. x e. ~P B ). |
| 7:6: | |- (. A C_ B ->. ( x e. ~P A -> x e. ~P B ) ). |
| 8:7: | |- (. A C_ B ->. A. x ( x e. ~P A -> x e. ~P B ) ). |
| 9:8: | |- (. A C_ B ->. ~P A C_ ~P B ). |
| qed:9: | |- ( A C_ B -> ~P A C_ ~P B ) |
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | sspwimpVD |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vex | ||
| 2 | 1 | vd01 | |
| 3 | idn1 | ||
| 4 | idn1 | ||
| 5 | elpwi | ||
| 6 | 4 5 | el1 | |
| 7 | sstr | ||
| 8 | 7 | ancoms | |
| 9 | 3 6 8 | el12 | |
| 10 | 2 9 | elpwgdedVD | |
| 11 | 2 9 10 | un0.1 | |
| 12 | 11 | int2 | |
| 13 | 12 | gen11 | |
| 14 | df-ss | ||
| 15 | 14 | biimpri | |
| 16 | 13 15 | el1 | |
| 17 | 16 | in1 |