Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem bj-hbxfrbi

Description: Closed form of hbxfrbi . Note: it is less important than nfbiit . The antecedent is in the "strong necessity" modality of modal logic (see also bj-nnftht ) in order not to require sp (modal T). See bj-hbyfrbi for its version with existential quantifiers. (Contributed by BJ, 6-May-2019)

Ref Expression
Assertion bj-hbxfrbi ( ( ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) → ( ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) ↔ ( 𝜓 → ∀ 𝑥 𝜓 ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 simpl ( ( ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) )
2 albi ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝜑𝜓 ) → ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ↔ ∀ 𝑥 𝜓 ) )
3 2 adantl ( ( ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) → ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ↔ ∀ 𝑥 𝜓 ) )
4 1 3 imbi12d ( ( ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) → ( ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) ↔ ( 𝜓 → ∀ 𝑥 𝜓 ) ) )