Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem bj-issetiv

Description: Version of bj-isseti with a disjoint variable condition on x , V . The hypothesis uses V instead of _V for extra generality. This is indeed more general than isseti as long as elex is not available (and the non-dependence of bj-issetiv on special properties of the universal class _V is obvious). Prefer its use over bj-isseti when sufficient (in particular when V is substituted for _V ). (Contributed by BJ, 14-Sep-2019) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypothesis bj-issetiv.1 𝐴𝑉
Assertion bj-issetiv 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 bj-issetiv.1 𝐴𝑉
2 elissetv ( 𝐴𝑉 → ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 )
3 1 2 ax-mp 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴