Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem rspceb2dv

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution in both directions. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 28-Sep-2024)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses rspceb2dv.1 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ) → ( 𝜓 → 𝜒 ) )
rspceb2dv.2 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
rspceb2dv.3 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ) → 𝜃 )
rspceb2dv.4 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜃 ) )
Assertion rspceb2dv ( 𝜑 → ( ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 rspceb2dv.1 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ) → ( 𝜓 → 𝜒 ) )
2 rspceb2dv.2 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
3 rspceb2dv.3 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ) → 𝜃 )
4 rspceb2dv.4 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜃 ) )
5 1 rexlimdva ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒 ) )
6 4 2 3 rspcedvdw ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ) → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 )
7 6 ex ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜒 → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ) )
8 5 7 impbid ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) )