Metamath Proof Explorer
Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution.
Variant of rspcedvd for equations. (Contributed by AV, 24-Dec-2019)
|
|
Ref |
Expression |
|
Hypotheses |
rspcedeqvd.1 |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ) |
|
|
rspcedeqvd.2 |
⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴 ) → 𝐶 = 𝐷 ) |
|
Assertion |
rspcedeqvd |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = 𝐷 ) |
Proof
| Step |
Hyp |
Ref |
Expression |
| 1 |
|
rspcedeqvd.1 |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ) |
| 2 |
|
rspcedeqvd.2 |
⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴 ) → 𝐶 = 𝐷 ) |
| 3 |
2 1
|
rspcime |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = 𝐷 ) |