Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem sbied

Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution (deduction version of sbie ) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 . See sbiedw , sbiedvw for variants using disjoint variables, but requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Jun-2018) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses sbied.1 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜑
sbied.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜒 )
sbied.3 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) ) )
Assertion sbied ( 𝜑 → ( [ 𝑦 / 𝑥 ] 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 sbied.1 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜑
2 sbied.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜒 )
3 sbied.3 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) ) )
4 1 sbrim ⊢ ( [ 𝑦 / 𝑥 ] ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ↔ ( 𝜑 → [ 𝑦 / 𝑥 ] 𝜓 ) )
5 1 2 nfim1 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 ( 𝜑 → 𝜒 )
6 3 com12 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) ) )
7 6 pm5.74d ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ↔ ( 𝜑 → 𝜒 ) ) )
8 5 7 sbie ⊢ ( [ 𝑦 / 𝑥 ] ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ↔ ( 𝜑 → 𝜒 ) )
9 4 8 bitr3i ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 → [ 𝑦 / 𝑥 ] 𝜓 ) ↔ ( 𝜑 → 𝜒 ) )
10 9 pm5.74ri ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( [ 𝑦 / 𝑥 ] 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) )