Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem tgextan

Description: tgexta 's strictness can be used -- a remote interior angle congruent to the exterior angle is contradictory, so anything follows. This is the shape tgaasexc consumes: that branch holds an angle congruence and must close on it, which the non-strict leA -only form of tgexta could never let it do. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses tgextan.p ⊢ 𝑃 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
tgextan.m ⊢ − = ( dist ‘ 𝐺 )
tgextan.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( Itv ‘ 𝐺 )
tgextan.l ⊢ 𝐿 = ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 )
tgextan.k ⊢ 𝐾 = ( hlG ‘ 𝐺 )
tgextan.s ⊢ ≤ = ( ≤∠ ‘ 𝐺 )
tgextan.g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
tgextan.a ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃 )
tgextan.b ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃 )
tgextan.c ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃 )
tgextan.d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃 )
tgextan.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ( 𝐵 𝐼 𝐷 ) )
tgextan.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ¬ ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝐵 𝐿 𝐶 ) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ) )
tgextan.3 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 )
tgextan.cgr ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 ”⟩ ( cgrA ‘ 𝐺 ) ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐶 𝐷 ”⟩ )
Assertion tgextan ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 tgextan.p ⊢ 𝑃 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
2 tgextan.m ⊢ − = ( dist ‘ 𝐺 )
3 tgextan.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( Itv ‘ 𝐺 )
4 tgextan.l ⊢ 𝐿 = ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 )
5 tgextan.k ⊢ 𝐾 = ( hlG ‘ 𝐺 )
6 tgextan.s ⊢ ≤ = ( ≤∠ ‘ 𝐺 )
7 tgextan.g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
8 tgextan.a ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃 )
9 tgextan.b ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃 )
10 tgextan.c ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃 )
11 tgextan.d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃 )
12 tgextan.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ( 𝐵 𝐼 𝐷 ) )
13 tgextan.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ¬ ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝐵 𝐿 𝐶 ) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ) )
14 tgextan.3 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 )
15 tgextan.cgr ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 ”⟩ ( cgrA ‘ 𝐺 ) ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐶 𝐷 ”⟩ )
16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 tgexta ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( ⟨“ 𝐵 𝐴 𝐶 ”⟩ ≤ ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐶 𝐷 ”⟩ ∧ ¬ ⟨“ 𝐵 𝐴 𝐶 ”⟩ ( cgrA ‘ 𝐺 ) ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐶 𝐷 ”⟩ ) ∧ ( ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 ”⟩ ≤ ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐶 𝐷 ”⟩ ∧ ¬ ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 ”⟩ ( cgrA ‘ 𝐺 ) ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐶 𝐷 ”⟩ ) ) )
17 16 simprd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 ”⟩ ≤ ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐶 𝐷 ”⟩ ∧ ¬ ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 ”⟩ ( cgrA ‘ 𝐺 ) ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐶 𝐷 ”⟩ ) )
18 17 simprd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ¬ ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 ”⟩ ( cgrA ‘ 𝐺 ) ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐶 𝐷 ”⟩ )
19 15 18 pm2.21dd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 )