Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem tgaasncol

Description: Slide a non-collinearity along the line it is off: if X is off line Y Z and W is a point of that line other than Z , then X is off line Z W too. Lines Z Y and Z W coincide ( tglineeltr ), which is what the exterior-angle hypothesis of tgaasexc needs at the moving point. (Contributed by JAG, 12-Aug-2026)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses tgaasncol.p ⊢ 𝑃 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
tgaasncol.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( Itv ‘ 𝐺 )
tgaasncol.l ⊢ 𝐿 = ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 )
tgaasncol.g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
tgaasncol.x ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 )
tgaasncol.y ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 )
tgaasncol.z ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃 )
tgaasncol.w ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃 )
tgaasncol.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ¬ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑌 𝐿 𝑍 ) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑍 ) )
tgaasncol.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑊 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑌 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑌 ) )
tgaasncol.3 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑊 ≠ 𝑍 )
Assertion tgaasncol ( 𝜑 → ¬ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 tgaasncol.p ⊢ 𝑃 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
2 tgaasncol.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( Itv ‘ 𝐺 )
3 tgaasncol.l ⊢ 𝐿 = ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 )
4 tgaasncol.g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
5 tgaasncol.x ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 )
6 tgaasncol.y ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 )
7 tgaasncol.z ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃 )
8 tgaasncol.w ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃 )
9 tgaasncol.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ¬ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑌 𝐿 𝑍 ) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑍 ) )
10 tgaasncol.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑊 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑌 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑌 ) )
11 tgaasncol.3 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑊 ≠ 𝑍 )
12 1 3 2 4 6 7 5 9 ncolcom ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ¬ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑌 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑌 ) )
13 4 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) ) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
14 7 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) ) → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃 )
15 6 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) ) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 )
16 1 3 2 4 6 7 5 9 ncolrot1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ¬ ( 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑋 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑋 ) )
17 1 2 3 4 6 7 5 16 ncolne1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍 )
18 17 necomd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑍 ≠ 𝑌 )
19 18 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) ) → 𝑍 ≠ 𝑌 )
20 8 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) ) → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃 )
21 11 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) ) → 𝑊 ≠ 𝑍 )
22 18 neneqd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ¬ 𝑍 = 𝑌 )
23 10 22 olcnd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑌 ) )
24 23 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) ) → 𝑊 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑌 ) )
25 5 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) ) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 )
26 simpr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) ) → ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) )
27 21 necomd ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) ) → 𝑍 ≠ 𝑊 )
28 27 neneqd ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) ) → ¬ 𝑍 = 𝑊 )
29 26 28 olcnd ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) ) → 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) )
30 1 2 3 13 14 15 19 20 21 24 25 29 tglineeltr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) ) → 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑌 ) )
31 30 orcd ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) ) → ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑌 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑌 ) )
32 12 31 mtand ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ¬ ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑊 ) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑊 ) )