Description: Version of equsalh with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 . Remark: this is the same as equsalhw . TODO: delete after moving the following paragraph somewhere.
Remarks: equsexvw has been moved to Main; Theorem ax13lem2 has a DV version which is a simple consequence of ax5e ; Theorems nfeqf2 , dveeq2 , nfeqf1 , dveeq1 , nfeqf , axc9 , ax13 , have dv versions which are simple consequences of ax-5 . (Contributed by BJ, 14-Jun-2019) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Hypotheses | bj-equsalhv.nf | |- ( ps -> A. x ps ) |
|
bj-equsalhv.1 | |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) |
||
Assertion | bj-equsalhv | |- ( A. x ( x = y -> ph ) <-> ps ) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | bj-equsalhv.nf | |- ( ps -> A. x ps ) |
|
2 | bj-equsalhv.1 | |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) |
|
3 | 1 | nf5i | |- F/ x ps |
4 | 3 2 | equsalv | |- ( A. x ( x = y -> ph ) <-> ps ) |