Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem sb56OLD

Description: Obsolete version of sbalex as of 21-Sep-2024. Two equivalent ways of expressing the proper substitution of y for x in ph , when x and y are distinct, namely, alternate definitions sb5 and sb6 . Theorem 6.2 of Quine p. 40. The proof does not involve df-sb . The implication "to the left" is equs4 and does not require any disjoint variable condition (but the version with a disjoint variable condition, equs4v , requires fewer axioms). Theorem equs45f replaces the disjoint variable condition with a nonfreeness hypothesis and equs5 replaces it with a distinctor as antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-2008) Revised to use equsexv in place of equsex in order to remove dependency on ax-13 . (Revised by BJ, 20-Dec-2020) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Assertion sb56OLD
|- ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) <-> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 sb5
 |-  ( [ y / x ] ph <-> E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) )
2 sb6
 |-  ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) )
3 1 2 bitr3i
 |-  ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) <-> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) )