Description: If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication of Exercise 18 of TakeutiZaring p. 18. sspwimpALT is the completed proof in conventional notation of the Virtual Deduction proof https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sspwimpaltvd.html . It was completed manually. The potential for automated derivation from the VD proof exists. See wvd1 for a description of Virtual Deduction. Some sub-theorems of the proof were completed using a unification deduction (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 9 used elpwgded ). Unification deductions employ Mario Carneiro's metavariable concept. Some sub-theorems were completed using a unification theorem (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 5 used elpwi ). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | sspwimpALT | |- ( A C_ B -> ~P A C_ ~P B ) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | vex | |- x e. _V |
|
2 | 1 | a1i | |- ( T. -> x e. _V ) |
3 | id | |- ( x e. ~P A -> x e. ~P A ) |
|
4 | elpwi | |- ( x e. ~P A -> x C_ A ) |
|
5 | 3 4 | syl | |- ( x e. ~P A -> x C_ A ) |
6 | id | |- ( A C_ B -> A C_ B ) |
|
7 | 5 6 | sylan9ssr | |- ( ( A C_ B /\ x e. ~P A ) -> x C_ B ) |
8 | 2 7 | elpwgded | |- ( ( T. /\ ( A C_ B /\ x e. ~P A ) ) -> x e. ~P B ) |
9 | 8 | uunT1 | |- ( ( A C_ B /\ x e. ~P A ) -> x e. ~P B ) |
10 | 9 | ex | |- ( A C_ B -> ( x e. ~P A -> x e. ~P B ) ) |
11 | 10 | alrimiv | |- ( A C_ B -> A. x ( x e. ~P A -> x e. ~P B ) ) |
12 | dfss2 | |- ( ~P A C_ ~P B <-> A. x ( x e. ~P A -> x e. ~P B ) ) |
|
13 | 12 | biimpri | |- ( A. x ( x e. ~P A -> x e. ~P B ) -> ~P A C_ ~P B ) |
14 | 11 13 | syl | |- ( A C_ B -> ~P A C_ ~P B ) |
15 | 14 | idiALT | |- ( A C_ B -> ~P A C_ ~P B ) |