Description: A lemma in closed form used to prove bj-cbvex in a weak axiomatization. (Contributed by BJ, 12-Mar-2023) Do not use 19.35 since only the direction of the biconditional used here holds in intuitionistic logic. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | bj-cbveximt | |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | bj-exalim | |
|
2 | 1 | alimi | |
3 | bj-alexim | |
|
4 | 2 3 | syl | |
5 | exim | |
|
6 | imim2 | |
|
7 | imim1 | |
|
8 | 5 6 7 | syl56 | |
9 | 4 8 | syl6com | |