Metamath Proof Explorer


Definition df-mo

Description: Define the at-most-one quantifier. The expression E* x ph is read "there exists at most one x such that ph ". This is also called the "uniqueness quantifier" but that expression is also used for the unique existential quantifier df-eu , therefore we avoid that ambiguous name.

Notation of BellMachover p. 460, whose definition we show as mo3 . For other possible definitions see moeu and mo4 .

Note that the definiens does not express "at-most-one" in the empty domain. Since the hypothesis relies on ax-6 , this case is excluded anyway. Nevertheless, it was suggested to begin with the definition of uniqueness ( eu6 ) and then define the at-most-one quantifier via moeu . Both eu6 and moeu remain valid in the empty domain.

The hypothesis asserts that the definition is independent of the particular choice of the dummy variable y . Without this hypothesis, mojust would be derivable from propositional axioms alone: one could apply the definiens for E* x ph twice, using different dummy variables y and z , and then invoke bitr3i to establish their equivalence. This would jeopardize the independence of axioms, as demonstrated in an analoguous situation involving df-ss to prove ax-8 (see in-ax8 ).

Prefer dfmo unless you can prove the hypothesis from fewer axioms in special cases. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 27-May-2019) Make this the definition (which used to be moeu , while this definition was then proved as dfmo ). (Revised by BJ, 30-Sep-2022)

Ref Expression
Hypothesis mojust.1 y x φ x = y z x φ x = z
Assertion df-mo * x φ y x φ x = y

Detailed syntax breakdown

Step Hyp Ref Expression
0 vx setvar x
1 wph wff φ
2 1 0 wmo wff * x φ
3 vy setvar y
4 0 cv setvar x
5 3 cv setvar y
6 4 5 wceq wff x = y
7 1 6 wi wff φ x = y
8 7 0 wal wff x φ x = y
9 8 3 wex wff y x φ x = y
10 2 9 wb wff * x φ y x φ x = y