Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem nabctnabc

Description: not ( a -> ( b /\ c ) ) we can show: not a implies ( b /\ c ). (Contributed by Jarvin Udandy, 7-Sep-2020)

Ref Expression
Hypothesis nabctnabc.1 ⊢ ¬ φ → ψ ∧ χ
Assertion nabctnabc ⊢ ¬ φ → ψ ∧ χ

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 nabctnabc.1 ⊢ ¬ φ → ψ ∧ χ
2 pm4.61 ⊢ ¬ φ → ψ ∧ χ ↔ φ ∧ ¬ ψ ∧ χ
3 2 biimpi ⊢ ¬ φ → ψ ∧ χ → φ ∧ ¬ ψ ∧ χ
4 1 3 ax-mp ⊢ φ ∧ ¬ ψ ∧ χ
5 4 simpli ⊢ φ
6 4 simpri ⊢ ¬ ψ ∧ χ
7 5 6 2th ⊢ φ ↔ ¬ ψ ∧ χ
8 bicom ⊢ φ ↔ ¬ ψ ∧ χ ↔ ¬ ψ ∧ χ ↔ φ
9 8 biimpi ⊢ φ ↔ ¬ ψ ∧ χ → ¬ ψ ∧ χ ↔ φ
10 7 9 ax-mp ⊢ ¬ ψ ∧ χ ↔ φ
11 10 biimpi ⊢ ¬ ψ ∧ χ → φ
12 11 con3i ⊢ ¬ φ → ¬ ¬ ψ ∧ χ
13 12 notnotrd ⊢ ¬ φ → ψ ∧ χ