Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem axtco2

Description: Weak form of the Axiom of Transitive Containment. See ax-tco for more information. In particular, this theorem shows the derivation of the weak form from the strong form. (Contributed by Matthew House, 6-Apr-2026)

Ref Expression
Assertion axtco2 ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑧 ( ( 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 axtco1 ⊢ ∃ 𝑦 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) )
2 elequ1 ⊢ ( 𝑧 = 𝑥 → ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ) )
3 2 biimprcd ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ( 𝑧 = 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) )
4 3 imim1d ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ( ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) → ( 𝑧 = 𝑥 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) ) )
5 4 alimdv ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ( ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) → ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧 = 𝑥 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) ) )
6 jao ⊢ ( ( 𝑧 = 𝑥 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) → ( ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) → ( ( 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) ) )
7 6 al2imi ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧 = 𝑥 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) → ( ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) → ∀ 𝑧 ( ( 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) ) )
8 5 7 syli ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ( ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) → ∀ 𝑧 ( ( 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) ) )
9 8 imp ⊢ ( ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) ) → ∀ 𝑧 ( ( 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) )
10 1 9 eximii ⊢ ∃ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑧 ( ( 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) )