Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem axtco1from2

Description: Strong form axtco1 of the Axiom of Transitive Containment, derived from the weak form axtco2 . See ax-tco for more information. As written, the proof uses ax-pr via el , but we could alternatively use ax-pow via elALT2 . Use axtco1 instead. (Contributed by Matthew House, 6-Apr-2026) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Assertion axtco1from2 𝑦 ( 𝑥𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 elequ1 ( 𝑣 = 𝑥 → ( 𝑣𝑦𝑥𝑦 ) )
2 1 anbi1d ( 𝑣 = 𝑥 → ( ( 𝑣𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) ) ↔ ( 𝑥𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) ) ) )
3 2 exbidv ( 𝑣 = 𝑥 → ( ∃ 𝑦 ( 𝑣𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) ) ↔ ∃ 𝑦 ( 𝑥𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) ) ) )
4 axtco2 𝑦𝑧 ( ( 𝑧 = 𝑢𝑧𝑦 ) → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) )
5 orc ( 𝑧 = 𝑢 → ( 𝑧 = 𝑢𝑧𝑦 ) )
6 elequ2 ( 𝑧 = 𝑢 → ( 𝑣𝑧𝑣𝑢 ) )
7 6 biimprd ( 𝑧 = 𝑢 → ( 𝑣𝑢𝑣𝑧 ) )
8 elequ1 ( 𝑤 = 𝑣 → ( 𝑤𝑧𝑣𝑧 ) )
9 elequ1 ( 𝑤 = 𝑣 → ( 𝑤𝑦𝑣𝑦 ) )
10 8 9 imbi12d ( 𝑤 = 𝑣 → ( ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ↔ ( 𝑣𝑧𝑣𝑦 ) ) )
11 10 spvv ( ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) → ( 𝑣𝑧𝑣𝑦 ) )
12 7 11 syl9 ( 𝑧 = 𝑢 → ( ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) → ( 𝑣𝑢𝑣𝑦 ) ) )
13 5 12 embantd ( 𝑧 = 𝑢 → ( ( ( 𝑧 = 𝑢𝑧𝑦 ) → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) → ( 𝑣𝑢𝑣𝑦 ) ) )
14 13 spimvw ( ∀ 𝑧 ( ( 𝑧 = 𝑢𝑧𝑦 ) → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) → ( 𝑣𝑢𝑣𝑦 ) )
15 14 com12 ( 𝑣𝑢 → ( ∀ 𝑧 ( ( 𝑧 = 𝑢𝑧𝑦 ) → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) → 𝑣𝑦 ) )
16 olc ( 𝑧𝑦 → ( 𝑧 = 𝑢𝑧𝑦 ) )
17 16 imim1i ( ( ( 𝑧 = 𝑢𝑧𝑦 ) → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) → ( 𝑧𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) )
18 17 alimi ( ∀ 𝑧 ( ( 𝑧 = 𝑢𝑧𝑦 ) → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) → ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) )
19 15 18 jca2 ( 𝑣𝑢 → ( ∀ 𝑧 ( ( 𝑧 = 𝑢𝑧𝑦 ) → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) → ( 𝑣𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) ) ) )
20 19 eximdv ( 𝑣𝑢 → ( ∃ 𝑦𝑧 ( ( 𝑧 = 𝑢𝑧𝑦 ) → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) → ∃ 𝑦 ( 𝑣𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) ) ) )
21 4 20 mpi ( 𝑣𝑢 → ∃ 𝑦 ( 𝑣𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) ) )
22 el 𝑢 𝑣𝑢
23 21 22 exlimiiv 𝑦 ( 𝑣𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) )
24 3 23 chvarvv 𝑦 ( 𝑥𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧𝑦 → ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤𝑧𝑤𝑦 ) ) )