Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem bnj562

Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 . This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses bnj562.18 ⊢ ( 𝜎 ↔ ( 𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) )
bnj562.19 ⊢ ( 𝜂 ↔ ( 𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝 ) )
bnj562.38 ⊢ ( ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎 ) → 𝜑″ )
Assertion bnj562 ( ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ) → 𝜑″ )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 bnj562.18 ⊢ ( 𝜎 ↔ ( 𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) )
2 bnj562.19 ⊢ ( 𝜂 ↔ ( 𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝 ) )
3 bnj562.38 ⊢ ( ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎 ) → 𝜑″ )
4 1 2 bnj556 ⊢ ( 𝜂 → 𝜎 )
5 4 3 syl3an3 ⊢ ( ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂 ) → 𝜑″ )