Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem cdlemg2ce

Description: Utility theorem to eliminate p,q when converting theorems with explicit f. TODO: fix comment. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2013)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses cdlemg2.b ⊢ 𝐵 = ( Base ‘ 𝐾 )
cdlemg2.l ⊢ ≤ = ( le ‘ 𝐾 )
cdlemg2.j ⊢ ∨ = ( join ‘ 𝐾 )
cdlemg2.m ⊢ ∧ = ( meet ‘ 𝐾 )
cdlemg2.a ⊢ 𝐴 = ( Atoms ‘ 𝐾 )
cdlemg2.h ⊢ 𝐻 = ( LHyp ‘ 𝐾 )
cdlemg2.t ⊢ 𝑇 = ( ( LTrn ‘ 𝐾 ) ‘ 𝑊 )
cdlemg2ex.u ⊢ 𝑈 = ( ( 𝑝 ∨ 𝑞 ) ∧ 𝑊 )
cdlemg2ex.d ⊢ 𝐷 = ( ( 𝑡 ∨ 𝑈 ) ∧ ( 𝑞 ∨ ( ( 𝑝 ∨ 𝑡 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) )
cdlemg2ex.e ⊢ 𝐸 = ( ( 𝑝 ∨ 𝑞 ) ∧ ( 𝐷 ∨ ( ( 𝑠 ∨ 𝑡 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) )
cdlemg2ex.g ⊢ 𝐺 = ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if ( ( 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊 ) , ( ℩ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ( ( ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ( 𝑠 ∨ ( 𝑥 ∧ 𝑊 ) ) = 𝑥 ) → 𝑧 = ( if ( 𝑠 ≤ ( 𝑝 ∨ 𝑞 ) , ( ℩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ( ( ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ ( 𝑝 ∨ 𝑞 ) ) → 𝑦 = 𝐸 ) ) , ⦋ 𝑠 / 𝑡 ⦌ 𝐷 ) ∨ ( 𝑥 ∧ 𝑊 ) ) ) ) , 𝑥 ) )
cdlemg2ce.p ⊢ ( 𝐹 = 𝐺 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) )
cdlemg2ce.c ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ) ∧ ( 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ) ) ∧ 𝜑 ) → 𝜒 )
Assertion cdlemg2ce ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) → 𝜓 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 cdlemg2.b ⊢ 𝐵 = ( Base ‘ 𝐾 )
2 cdlemg2.l ⊢ ≤ = ( le ‘ 𝐾 )
3 cdlemg2.j ⊢ ∨ = ( join ‘ 𝐾 )
4 cdlemg2.m ⊢ ∧ = ( meet ‘ 𝐾 )
5 cdlemg2.a ⊢ 𝐴 = ( Atoms ‘ 𝐾 )
6 cdlemg2.h ⊢ 𝐻 = ( LHyp ‘ 𝐾 )
7 cdlemg2.t ⊢ 𝑇 = ( ( LTrn ‘ 𝐾 ) ‘ 𝑊 )
8 cdlemg2ex.u ⊢ 𝑈 = ( ( 𝑝 ∨ 𝑞 ) ∧ 𝑊 )
9 cdlemg2ex.d ⊢ 𝐷 = ( ( 𝑡 ∨ 𝑈 ) ∧ ( 𝑞 ∨ ( ( 𝑝 ∨ 𝑡 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) )
10 cdlemg2ex.e ⊢ 𝐸 = ( ( 𝑝 ∨ 𝑞 ) ∧ ( 𝐷 ∨ ( ( 𝑠 ∨ 𝑡 ) ∧ 𝑊 ) ) )
11 cdlemg2ex.g ⊢ 𝐺 = ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if ( ( 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊 ) , ( ℩ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ( ( ¬ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ( 𝑠 ∨ ( 𝑥 ∧ 𝑊 ) ) = 𝑥 ) → 𝑧 = ( if ( 𝑠 ≤ ( 𝑝 ∨ 𝑞 ) , ( ℩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ( ( ¬ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑡 ≤ ( 𝑝 ∨ 𝑞 ) ) → 𝑦 = 𝐸 ) ) , ⦋ 𝑠 / 𝑡 ⦌ 𝐷 ) ∨ ( 𝑥 ∧ 𝑊 ) ) ) ) , 𝑥 ) )
12 cdlemg2ce.p ⊢ ( 𝐹 = 𝐺 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) )
13 cdlemg2ce.c ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ) ∧ ( 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ) ) ∧ 𝜑 ) → 𝜒 )
14 simp2 ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 )
15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 cdlemg2cex ⊢ ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) → ( 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ ∃ 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) ) )
16 15 3ad2ant1 ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) → ( 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ ∃ 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) ) )
17 14 16 mpbid ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) → ∃ 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) )
18 simp11 ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) ∧ ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) ) → ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) )
19 simp2l ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) ∧ ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) ) → 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 )
20 simp31 ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) ∧ ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) ) → ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 )
21 19 20 jca ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) ∧ ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) ) → ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ) )
22 simp2r ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) ∧ ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) ) → 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 )
23 simp32 ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) ∧ ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) ) → ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 )
24 22 23 jca ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) ∧ ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) ) → ( 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ) )
25 simp13 ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) ∧ ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) ) → 𝜑 )
26 18 21 24 25 13 syl31anc ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) ∧ ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) ) → 𝜒 )
27 simp33 ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) ∧ ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) ) → 𝐹 = 𝐺 )
28 27 12 syl ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) ∧ ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) ) → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) )
29 26 28 mpbird ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) ∧ ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) ) → 𝜓 )
30 29 3exp ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) → ( ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ) → ( ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) → 𝜓 ) ) )
31 30 rexlimdvv ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) → ( ∃ 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ( ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) → 𝜓 ) )
32 17 31 mpd ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝜑 ) → 𝜓 )