Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem cgranbtwn

Description: Null angle implies betweenness. (Contributed by SS, 4-Jun-2026)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses cgranbtwn.p 𝑃 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
cgranbtwn.i 𝐼 = ( Itv ‘ 𝐺 )
cgranbtwn.g ( 𝜑𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
cgranbtwn.a ( 𝜑𝐴𝑃 )
cgranbtwn.b ( 𝜑𝐵𝑃 )
cgranbtwn.c ( 𝜑𝐶𝑃 )
cgranbtwn.d ( 𝜑𝐷𝑃 )
cgranbtwn.e ( 𝜑𝐸𝑃 )
cgranbtwn.f ( 𝜑𝐹𝑃 )
cgranbtwn.1 ( 𝜑 → ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 ”⟩ ( cgrA ‘ 𝐺 ) ⟨“ 𝐷 𝐸 𝐹 ”⟩ )
cgranbtwn.2 ( 𝜑𝐴 ∈ ( 𝐵 𝐼 𝐶 ) )
Assertion cgranbtwn ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐷 ∈ ( 𝐸 𝐼 𝐹 ) ∨ 𝐹 ∈ ( 𝐸 𝐼 𝐷 ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 cgranbtwn.p 𝑃 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
2 cgranbtwn.i 𝐼 = ( Itv ‘ 𝐺 )
3 cgranbtwn.g ( 𝜑𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
4 cgranbtwn.a ( 𝜑𝐴𝑃 )
5 cgranbtwn.b ( 𝜑𝐵𝑃 )
6 cgranbtwn.c ( 𝜑𝐶𝑃 )
7 cgranbtwn.d ( 𝜑𝐷𝑃 )
8 cgranbtwn.e ( 𝜑𝐸𝑃 )
9 cgranbtwn.f ( 𝜑𝐹𝑃 )
10 cgranbtwn.1 ( 𝜑 → ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 ”⟩ ( cgrA ‘ 𝐺 ) ⟨“ 𝐷 𝐸 𝐹 ”⟩ )
11 cgranbtwn.2 ( 𝜑𝐴 ∈ ( 𝐵 𝐼 𝐶 ) )
12 eqid ( dist ‘ 𝐺 ) = ( dist ‘ 𝐺 )
13 eqid ( hlG ‘ 𝐺 ) = ( hlG ‘ 𝐺 )
14 1 2 13 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 cgrane2 ( 𝜑𝐵𝐶 )
15 1 2 13 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 cgrane1 ( 𝜑𝐴𝐵 )
16 1 2 13 5 6 4 3 4 11 14 15 btwnhl1 ( 𝜑𝐴 ( ( hlG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐵 ) 𝐶 )
17 1 2 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 16 cgrahl ( 𝜑𝐷 ( ( hlG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐸 ) 𝐹 )
18 1 2 13 7 9 8 3 ishlg ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐷 ( ( hlG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐸 ) 𝐹 ↔ ( 𝐷𝐸𝐹𝐸 ∧ ( 𝐷 ∈ ( 𝐸 𝐼 𝐹 ) ∨ 𝐹 ∈ ( 𝐸 𝐼 𝐷 ) ) ) ) )
19 17 18 mpbid ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐷𝐸𝐹𝐸 ∧ ( 𝐷 ∈ ( 𝐸 𝐼 𝐹 ) ∨ 𝐹 ∈ ( 𝐸 𝐼 𝐷 ) ) ) )
20 19 simp3d ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐷 ∈ ( 𝐸 𝐼 𝐹 ) ∨ 𝐹 ∈ ( 𝐸 𝐼 𝐷 ) ) )