Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem cocanss1

Description: Cancellation law for composition. Suggested by BJ. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 30-Sep-2026)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses cocan1g.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → Fun ◡ 𝐹 )
cocan1g.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → Rel 𝐻 )
cocan1g.3 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ran 𝐻 ⊆ dom 𝐹 )
Assertion cocanss1 ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐻 ) ⊆ ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐾 ) ↔ 𝐻 ⊆ 𝐾 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 cocan1g.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → Fun ◡ 𝐹 )
2 cocan1g.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → Rel 𝐻 )
3 cocan1g.3 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ran 𝐻 ⊆ dom 𝐹 )
4 relcnv ⊢ Rel ◡ 𝐻
5 4 a1i ⊢ ( 𝜑 → Rel ◡ 𝐻 )
6 df-rn ⊢ ran 𝐻 = dom ◡ 𝐻
7 dfdm4 ⊢ dom 𝐹 = ran ◡ 𝐹
8 3 6 7 3sstr3g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → dom ◡ 𝐻 ⊆ ran ◡ 𝐹 )
9 1 5 8 cocanss2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( ◡ 𝐻 ∘ ◡ 𝐹 ) ⊆ ( ◡ 𝐾 ∘ ◡ 𝐹 ) ↔ ◡ 𝐻 ⊆ ◡ 𝐾 ) )
10 relco ⊢ Rel ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐻 )
11 cnvssb ⊢ ( Rel ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐻 ) → ( ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐻 ) ⊆ ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐾 ) ↔ ◡ ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐻 ) ⊆ ◡ ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐾 ) ) )
12 10 11 ax-mp ⊢ ( ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐻 ) ⊆ ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐾 ) ↔ ◡ ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐻 ) ⊆ ◡ ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐾 ) )
13 cnvco ⊢ ◡ ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐻 ) = ( ◡ 𝐻 ∘ ◡ 𝐹 )
14 cnvco ⊢ ◡ ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐾 ) = ( ◡ 𝐾 ∘ ◡ 𝐹 )
15 13 14 sseq12i ⊢ ( ◡ ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐻 ) ⊆ ◡ ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐾 ) ↔ ( ◡ 𝐻 ∘ ◡ 𝐹 ) ⊆ ( ◡ 𝐾 ∘ ◡ 𝐹 ) )
16 12 15 bitri ⊢ ( ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐻 ) ⊆ ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐾 ) ↔ ( ◡ 𝐻 ∘ ◡ 𝐹 ) ⊆ ( ◡ 𝐾 ∘ ◡ 𝐹 ) )
17 16 a1i ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐻 ) ⊆ ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐾 ) ↔ ( ◡ 𝐻 ∘ ◡ 𝐹 ) ⊆ ( ◡ 𝐾 ∘ ◡ 𝐹 ) ) )
18 cnvssb ⊢ ( Rel 𝐻 → ( 𝐻 ⊆ 𝐾 ↔ ◡ 𝐻 ⊆ ◡ 𝐾 ) )
19 2 18 syl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐻 ⊆ 𝐾 ↔ ◡ 𝐻 ⊆ ◡ 𝐾 ) )
20 9 17 19 3bitr4d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐻 ) ⊆ ( 𝐹 ∘ 𝐾 ) ↔ 𝐻 ⊆ 𝐾 ) )