Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem equsexvw

Description: Version of equsexv with a disjoint variable condition, and of equsex with two disjoint variable conditions, which requires fewer axioms. See also the dual form equsalvw . (Contributed by BJ, 31-May-2019) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Oct-2023)

Ref Expression
Hypothesis equsalvw.1 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) )
Assertion equsexvw ( ∃ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 ) ↔ 𝜓 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 equsalvw.1 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) )
2 alinexa ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ 𝜑 ) ↔ ¬ ∃ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 ) )
3 1 notbid ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓 ) )
4 3 equsalvw ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ 𝜑 ) ↔ ¬ 𝜓 )
5 2 4 bitr3i ⊢ ( ¬ ∃ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 ) ↔ ¬ 𝜓 )
6 5 con4bii ⊢ ( ∃ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 ) ↔ 𝜓 )