Theorem inxpssidinxp

Description: Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation, special case of inxpss2 . (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jul-2019)

	Ref	Expression
Assertion	inxpssidinxp	⊢ ( ( 𝑅 ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐵 ) ) ⊆ ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐵 ) ) ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ( 𝑥 𝑅 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) )

Proof

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inxpss2	⊢ ( ( 𝑅 ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐵 ) ) ⊆ ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐵 ) ) ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ( 𝑥 𝑅 𝑦 → 𝑥 I 𝑦 ) )
2		ideqg	⊢ ( 𝑦 ∈ V → ( 𝑥 I 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) )
3	2	elv	⊢ ( 𝑥 I 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦 )
4	3	imbi2i	⊢ ( ( 𝑥 𝑅 𝑦 → 𝑥 I 𝑦 ) ↔ ( 𝑥 𝑅 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) )
5	4	2ralbii	⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ( 𝑥 𝑅 𝑦 → 𝑥 I 𝑦 ) ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ( 𝑥 𝑅 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) )
6	1 5	bitri	⊢ ( ( 𝑅 ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐵 ) ) ⊆ ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐵 ) ) ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ( 𝑥 𝑅 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) )