Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem jcad

Description: Deduction conjoining the consequents of two implications. Deduction form of jca and double deduction form of pm3.2 and pm3.2i . (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-1993) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Jul-2013)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses jcad.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜒 ) )
jcad.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜃 ) )
Assertion jcad ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 → ( 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 jcad.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜒 ) )
2 jcad.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜃 ) )
3 pm3.2 ⊢ ( 𝜒 → ( 𝜃 → ( 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ) ) )
4 1 2 3 syl6c ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 → ( 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ) ) )