Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem mnuprss2d

Description: Special case of mnuprssd . (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses mnuprss2d.1 ⊢ 𝑀 = { 𝑘 ∣ ∀ 𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 ( 𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀ 𝑚 ∃ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 ( 𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 ( ∃ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚 ) → ∃ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛 ) ) ) ) }
mnuprss2d.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀 )
mnuprss2d.3 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈 )
mnuprss2d.4 ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶
mnuprss2d.5 ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶
Assertion mnuprss2d ( 𝜑 → { 𝐴 , 𝐵 } ∈ 𝑈 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 mnuprss2d.1 ⊢ 𝑀 = { 𝑘 ∣ ∀ 𝑙 ∈ 𝑘 ( 𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑘 ∧ ∀ 𝑚 ∃ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑘 ( 𝒫 𝑙 ⊆ 𝑛 ∧ ∀ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑙 ( ∃ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑚 ) → ∃ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑚 ( 𝑝 ∈ 𝑟 ∧ ∪ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝑛 ) ) ) ) }
2 mnuprss2d.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑀 )
3 mnuprss2d.3 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈 )
4 mnuprss2d.4 ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶
5 mnuprss2d.5 ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶
6 4 a1i ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 )
7 5 a1i ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 )
8 1 2 3 6 7 mnuprssd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → { 𝐴 , 𝐵 } ∈ 𝑈 )