Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem ovmpox2

Description: The value of an operation class abstraction. Variant of ovmpoga which does not require D and x to be distinct. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses ovmpox2.1 ⊢ ( ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ) → 𝑅 = 𝑆 )
ovmpox2.2 ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐿 )
ovmpox2.3 ⊢ 𝐹 = ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅 )
Assertion ovmpox2 ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻 ) → ( 𝐴 𝐹 𝐵 ) = 𝑆 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 ovmpox2.1 ⊢ ( ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ) → 𝑅 = 𝑆 )
2 ovmpox2.2 ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐿 )
3 ovmpox2.3 ⊢ 𝐹 = ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅 )
4 3 a1i ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻 ) → 𝐹 = ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑅 ) )
5 1 adantl ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ) ) → 𝑅 = 𝑆 )
6 2 adantl ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻 ) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ) → 𝐶 = 𝐿 )
7 simp1 ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻 ) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 )
8 simp2 ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻 ) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 )
9 simp3 ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻 ) → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻 )
10 4 5 6 7 8 9 ovmpordx ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐻 ) → ( 𝐴 𝐹 𝐵 ) = 𝑆 )