Metamath Proof Explorer
		
		
		Theorem spd
		Description:  Specialization deduction, using implicit substitution.  Based on the
       proof of spimed .  (Contributed by Emmett Weisz, 17-Jan-2020)
		
			
				
					|  |  | Ref | Expression | 
					
						|  | Hypotheses | spd.1 | ⊢ ( 𝜒  →  Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 ) | 
					
						|  |  | spd.2 | ⊢ ( 𝑥  =  𝑦  →  ( 𝜑  ↔  𝜓 ) ) | 
				
					|  | Assertion | spd | ⊢  ( 𝜒  →  ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑  →  𝜓 ) ) | 
			
		
		
			
				Proof
				
					
						| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression | 
						
							| 1 |  | spd.1 | ⊢ ( 𝜒  →  Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 ) | 
						
							| 2 |  | spd.2 | ⊢ ( 𝑥  =  𝑦  →  ( 𝜑  ↔  𝜓 ) ) | 
						
							| 3 |  | ax6e | ⊢ ∃ 𝑥 𝑥  =  𝑦 | 
						
							| 4 | 2 | biimpd | ⊢ ( 𝑥  =  𝑦  →  ( 𝜑  →  𝜓 ) ) | 
						
							| 5 | 3 4 | eximii | ⊢ ∃ 𝑥 ( 𝜑  →  𝜓 ) | 
						
							| 6 | 5 | 19.35i | ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑  →  ∃ 𝑥 𝜓 ) | 
						
							| 7 | 1 | 19.9d | ⊢ ( 𝜒  →  ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜓  →  𝜓 ) ) | 
						
							| 8 | 6 7 | syl5 | ⊢ ( 𝜒  →  ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑  →  𝜓 ) ) |