Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem spd

Description: Specialization deduction, using implicit substitution. Based on the proof of spimed . (Contributed by Emmett Weisz, 17-Jan-2020)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses spd.1 ⊢ ( 𝜒 → Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 )
spd.2 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) )
Assertion spd ( 𝜒 → ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 spd.1 ⊢ ( 𝜒 → Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 )
2 spd.2 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) )
3 ax6e ⊢ ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
4 2 biimpd ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) )
5 3 4 eximii ⊢ ∃ 𝑥 ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 )
6 5 19.35i ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑥 𝜓 )
7 1 19.9d ⊢ ( 𝜒 → ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜓 ) )
8 6 7 syl5 ⊢ ( 𝜒 → ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) )