Metamath Proof Explorer
Theorem spd
Description: Specialization deduction, using implicit substitution. Based on the
proof of spimed . (Contributed by Emmett Weisz, 17-Jan-2020)
|
|
Ref |
Expression |
|
Hypotheses |
spd.1 |
⊢ ( 𝜒 → Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 ) |
|
|
spd.2 |
⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) ) |
|
Assertion |
spd |
⊢ ( 𝜒 → ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ) |
Proof
| Step |
Hyp |
Ref |
Expression |
| 1 |
|
spd.1 |
⊢ ( 𝜒 → Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 ) |
| 2 |
|
spd.2 |
⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) ) |
| 3 |
|
ax6e |
⊢ ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 |
| 4 |
2
|
biimpd |
⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ) |
| 5 |
3 4
|
eximii |
⊢ ∃ 𝑥 ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) |
| 6 |
5
|
19.35i |
⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑥 𝜓 ) |
| 7 |
1
|
19.9d |
⊢ ( 𝜒 → ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜓 ) ) |
| 8 |
6 7
|
syl5 |
⊢ ( 𝜒 → ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ) |