Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem tgaas1h

Description: tgaas1 with the constructed point H still explicit: the case split on F = H . Equal, and the side equality is a substitution; distinct, and tgaasne closes the branch. BOTH branches are proved -- assuming F = H would be assuming the theorem. (Contributed by JAG , 12-Aug-2026)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses tgaascgra.p ⊢ 𝑃 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
tgaascgra.m ⊢ − = ( dist ‘ 𝐺 )
tgaascgra.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( Itv ‘ 𝐺 )
tgaascgra.l ⊢ 𝐿 = ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 )
tgaascgra.k ⊢ 𝐾 = ( hlG ‘ 𝐺 )
tgaascgra.g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
tgaascgra.a ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃 )
tgaascgra.b ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃 )
tgaascgra.c ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃 )
tgaascgra.d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃 )
tgaascgra.e ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃 )
tgaascgra.f ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃 )
tgaascgra.h ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃 )
tgaascgra.ncol ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ¬ ( 𝐶 ∈ ( 𝐴 𝐿 𝐵 ) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ) )
tgaascgra.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐴 − 𝐵 ) = ( 𝐷 − 𝐸 ) )
tgaascgra.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 ”⟩ ( cgrA ‘ 𝐺 ) ⟨“ 𝐷 𝐸 𝐹 ”⟩ )
tgaascgra.3 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ⟨“ 𝐵 𝐶 𝐴 ”⟩ ( cgrA ‘ 𝐺 ) ⟨“ 𝐸 𝐹 𝐷 ”⟩ )
tgaascgra.4 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐻 ( 𝐾 ‘ 𝐸 ) 𝐹 )
tgaascgra.5 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐸 − 𝐻 ) = ( 𝐵 − 𝐶 ) )
Assertion tgaas1h ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐵 − 𝐶 ) = ( 𝐸 − 𝐹 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 tgaascgra.p ⊢ 𝑃 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
2 tgaascgra.m ⊢ − = ( dist ‘ 𝐺 )
3 tgaascgra.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( Itv ‘ 𝐺 )
4 tgaascgra.l ⊢ 𝐿 = ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 )
5 tgaascgra.k ⊢ 𝐾 = ( hlG ‘ 𝐺 )
6 tgaascgra.g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
7 tgaascgra.a ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃 )
8 tgaascgra.b ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃 )
9 tgaascgra.c ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃 )
10 tgaascgra.d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃 )
11 tgaascgra.e ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃 )
12 tgaascgra.f ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃 )
13 tgaascgra.h ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃 )
14 tgaascgra.ncol ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ¬ ( 𝐶 ∈ ( 𝐴 𝐿 𝐵 ) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ) )
15 tgaascgra.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐴 − 𝐵 ) = ( 𝐷 − 𝐸 ) )
16 tgaascgra.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 ”⟩ ( cgrA ‘ 𝐺 ) ⟨“ 𝐷 𝐸 𝐹 ”⟩ )
17 tgaascgra.3 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ⟨“ 𝐵 𝐶 𝐴 ”⟩ ( cgrA ‘ 𝐺 ) ⟨“ 𝐸 𝐹 𝐷 ”⟩ )
18 tgaascgra.4 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐻 ( 𝐾 ‘ 𝐸 ) 𝐹 )
19 tgaascgra.5 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐸 − 𝐻 ) = ( 𝐵 − 𝐶 ) )
20 19 eqcomd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐵 − 𝐶 ) = ( 𝐸 − 𝐻 ) )
21 20 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐻 ) → ( 𝐵 − 𝐶 ) = ( 𝐸 − 𝐻 ) )
22 simpr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐻 ) → 𝐹 = 𝐻 )
23 22 oveq2d ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐻 ) → ( 𝐸 − 𝐹 ) = ( 𝐸 − 𝐻 ) )
24 23 eqcomd ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐻 ) → ( 𝐸 − 𝐻 ) = ( 𝐸 − 𝐹 ) )
25 21 24 eqtrd ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐻 ) → ( 𝐵 − 𝐶 ) = ( 𝐸 − 𝐹 ) )
26 6 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻 ) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
27 10 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻 ) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃 )
28 11 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻 ) → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃 )
29 12 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻 ) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃 )
30 13 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻 ) → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃 )
31 1 3 2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 16 4 14 cgrancol ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ¬ ( 𝐹 ∈ ( 𝐷 𝐿 𝐸 ) ∨ 𝐷 = 𝐸 ) )
32 1 4 3 6 10 11 12 31 ncolrot1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ¬ ( 𝐷 ∈ ( 𝐸 𝐿 𝐹 ) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹 ) )
33 32 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻 ) → ¬ ( 𝐷 ∈ ( 𝐸 𝐿 𝐹 ) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹 ) )
34 18 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻 ) → 𝐻 ( 𝐾 ‘ 𝐸 ) 𝐹 )
35 simpr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻 ) → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻 )
36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 tgaascgra ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ⟨“ 𝐷 𝐹 𝐸 ”⟩ ( cgrA ‘ 𝐺 ) ⟨“ 𝐷 𝐻 𝐸 ”⟩ )
37 36 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻 ) → ⟨“ 𝐷 𝐹 𝐸 ”⟩ ( cgrA ‘ 𝐺 ) ⟨“ 𝐷 𝐻 𝐸 ”⟩ )
38 1 2 3 4 5 26 27 28 29 30 33 34 35 37 tgaasne ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐻 ) → ( 𝐵 − 𝐶 ) = ( 𝐸 − 𝐹 ) )
39 25 38 pm2.61dane ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐵 − 𝐶 ) = ( 𝐸 − 𝐹 ) )