Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem ax6e

Description: At least one individual exists. This is not a theorem of free logic, which is sound in empty domains. For such a logic, we would add this theorem as an axiom of set theory (Axiom 0 of Kunen p. 10). In the system consisting of ax-4 through ax-9 , all axioms other than ax-6 are believed to be theorems of free logic, although the system without ax-6 is not complete in free logic.

Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 . It is preferred to use ax6ev when it is sufficient. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993) Shortened after ax13lem1 became available. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Assertion ax6e
|- E. x x = y

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 19.8a
 |-  ( x = y -> E. x x = y )
2 ax13lem1
 |-  ( -. x = y -> ( w = y -> A. x w = y ) )
3 ax6ev
 |-  E. x x = w
4 equtr
 |-  ( x = w -> ( w = y -> x = y ) )
5 3 4 eximii
 |-  E. x ( w = y -> x = y )
6 5 19.35i
 |-  ( A. x w = y -> E. x x = y )
7 2 6 syl6com
 |-  ( w = y -> ( -. x = y -> E. x x = y ) )
8 ax6ev
 |-  E. w w = y
9 7 8 exlimiiv
 |-  ( -. x = y -> E. x x = y )
10 1 9 pm2.61i
 |-  E. x x = y