Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem ax6e

Description: At least one individual exists. This is not a theorem of free logic, which is sound in empty domains. For such a logic, we would add this theorem as an axiom of set theory (Axiom 0 of Kunen p. 10). In the system consisting of ax-4 through ax-9 , all axioms other than ax-6 are believed to be theorems of free logic, although the system without ax-6 is not complete in free logic.

Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 . It is preferred to use ax6ev when it is sufficient. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993) Shortened after ax13lem1 became available. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Assertion ax6e ⊢ ∃ x x = y

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 19.8a ⊢ x = y → ∃ x x = y
2 ax13lem1 ⊢ ¬ x = y → w = y → ∀ x w = y
3 ax6ev ⊢ ∃ x x = w
4 equtr ⊢ x = w → w = y → x = y
5 3 4 eximii ⊢ ∃ x w = y → x = y
6 5 19.35i ⊢ ∀ x w = y → ∃ x x = y
7 2 6 syl6com ⊢ w = y → ¬ x = y → ∃ x x = y
8 ax6ev ⊢ ∃ w w = y
9 7 8 exlimiiv ⊢ ¬ x = y → ∃ x x = y
10 1 9 pm2.61i ⊢ ∃ x x = y