Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem bj-cbveximdlem

Description: A lemma for alpha-renaming of variables bound by an existential quantifier. Hypothesis bj-cbveximdlem.nfth can be proved either from DV conditions as in bj-cbveximdv or from a nonfreeness condition and excom as in bj-cbveximd . Hypothesis bj-cbveximdlem.denote is weaker than the corresponding hypothesis of ~bj-cbveximd0 , and this proof is therefore a bit longer, not using bj-spime but bj-eximcom . (Contributed by BJ, 12-Mar-2023) Proof should not use 19.35 . (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses bj-cbveximdlem.nf0
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )
bj-cbveximdlem.nf1
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )
bj-cbveximdlem.nfch
|- ( ph -> ( ch -> A. y ch ) )
bj-cbveximdlem.nfth
|- ( ph -> ( E. x E. y th -> E. y th ) )
bj-cbveximdlem.denote
|- ( ph -> A. x E. y ps )
bj-cbveximdlem.maj
|- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ( ch -> th ) )
Assertion bj-cbveximdlem
|- ( ph -> ( E. x ch -> E. y th ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 bj-cbveximdlem.nf0
 |-  ( ph -> A. x ph )
2 bj-cbveximdlem.nf1
 |-  ( ph -> A. y ph )
3 bj-cbveximdlem.nfch
 |-  ( ph -> ( ch -> A. y ch ) )
4 bj-cbveximdlem.nfth
 |-  ( ph -> ( E. x E. y th -> E. y th ) )
5 bj-cbveximdlem.denote
 |-  ( ph -> A. x E. y ps )
6 bj-cbveximdlem.maj
 |-  ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ( ch -> th ) )
7 6 ex
 |-  ( ph -> ( ps -> ( ch -> th ) ) )
8 2 7 eximdh
 |-  ( ph -> ( E. y ps -> E. y ( ch -> th ) ) )
9 1 8 alimdh
 |-  ( ph -> ( A. x E. y ps -> A. x E. y ( ch -> th ) ) )
10 5 9 mpd
 |-  ( ph -> A. x E. y ( ch -> th ) )
11 bj-eximcom
 |-  ( E. y ( ch -> th ) -> ( A. y ch -> E. y th ) )
12 10 4 11 bj-exlimd
 |-  ( ph -> ( E. x A. y ch -> E. y th ) )
13 1 12 3 bj-exlimd
 |-  ( ph -> ( E. x ch -> E. y th ) )