Description: A lemma for alpha-renaming of variables bound by an existential quantifier. Hypothesis bj-cbveximdlem.nfth can be proved either from DV conditions as in bj-cbveximdv or from a nonfreeness condition and excom as in bj-cbveximd . Hypothesis bj-cbveximdlem.denote is weaker than the corresponding hypothesis of ~bj-cbveximd0 , and this proof is therefore a bit longer, not using bj-spime but bj-eximcom . (Contributed by BJ, 12-Mar-2023) Proof should not use 19.35 . (Proof modification is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | bj-cbveximdlem.nf0 | |- ( ph -> A. x ph ) |
|
| bj-cbveximdlem.nf1 | |- ( ph -> A. y ph ) |
||
| bj-cbveximdlem.nfch | |- ( ph -> ( ch -> A. y ch ) ) |
||
| bj-cbveximdlem.nfth | |- ( ph -> ( E. x E. y th -> E. y th ) ) |
||
| bj-cbveximdlem.denote | |- ( ph -> A. x E. y ps ) |
||
| bj-cbveximdlem.maj | |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ( ch -> th ) ) |
||
| Assertion | bj-cbveximdlem | |- ( ph -> ( E. x ch -> E. y th ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bj-cbveximdlem.nf0 | |- ( ph -> A. x ph ) |
|
| 2 | bj-cbveximdlem.nf1 | |- ( ph -> A. y ph ) |
|
| 3 | bj-cbveximdlem.nfch | |- ( ph -> ( ch -> A. y ch ) ) |
|
| 4 | bj-cbveximdlem.nfth | |- ( ph -> ( E. x E. y th -> E. y th ) ) |
|
| 5 | bj-cbveximdlem.denote | |- ( ph -> A. x E. y ps ) |
|
| 6 | bj-cbveximdlem.maj | |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ( ch -> th ) ) |
|
| 7 | 6 | ex | |- ( ph -> ( ps -> ( ch -> th ) ) ) |
| 8 | 2 7 | eximdh | |- ( ph -> ( E. y ps -> E. y ( ch -> th ) ) ) |
| 9 | 1 8 | alimdh | |- ( ph -> ( A. x E. y ps -> A. x E. y ( ch -> th ) ) ) |
| 10 | 5 9 | mpd | |- ( ph -> A. x E. y ( ch -> th ) ) |
| 11 | bj-eximcom | |- ( E. y ( ch -> th ) -> ( A. y ch -> E. y th ) ) |
|
| 12 | 10 4 11 | bj-exlimd | |- ( ph -> ( E. x A. y ch -> E. y th ) ) |
| 13 | 1 12 3 | bj-exlimd | |- ( ph -> ( E. x ch -> E. y th ) ) |