Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem cbvoprab13vw

Description: Change the first and third bound variables in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by GG, 14-Aug-2025)

Ref Expression
Hypothesis cbvoprab13vw.1
|- ( ( x = w /\ z = v ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
Assertion cbvoprab13vw
|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps } = { <. <. w , y >. , v >. | ch }

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 cbvoprab13vw.1
 |-  ( ( x = w /\ z = v ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
2 opeq1
 |-  ( x = w -> <. x , y >. = <. w , y >. )
3 2 adantr
 |-  ( ( x = w /\ z = v ) -> <. x , y >. = <. w , y >. )
4 simpr
 |-  ( ( x = w /\ z = v ) -> z = v )
5 3 4 opeq12d
 |-  ( ( x = w /\ z = v ) -> <. <. x , y >. , z >. = <. <. w , y >. , v >. )
6 5 eqeq2d
 |-  ( ( x = w /\ z = v ) -> ( t = <. <. x , y >. , z >. <-> t = <. <. w , y >. , v >. ) )
7 6 1 anbi12d
 |-  ( ( x = w /\ z = v ) -> ( ( t = <. <. x , y >. , z >. /\ ps ) <-> ( t = <. <. w , y >. , v >. /\ ch ) ) )
8 7 cbvexdvaw
 |-  ( x = w -> ( E. z ( t = <. <. x , y >. , z >. /\ ps ) <-> E. v ( t = <. <. w , y >. , v >. /\ ch ) ) )
9 8 exbidv
 |-  ( x = w -> ( E. y E. z ( t = <. <. x , y >. , z >. /\ ps ) <-> E. y E. v ( t = <. <. w , y >. , v >. /\ ch ) ) )
10 9 cbvexvw
 |-  ( E. x E. y E. z ( t = <. <. x , y >. , z >. /\ ps ) <-> E. w E. y E. v ( t = <. <. w , y >. , v >. /\ ch ) )
11 10 abbii
 |-  { t | E. x E. y E. z ( t = <. <. x , y >. , z >. /\ ps ) } = { t | E. w E. y E. v ( t = <. <. w , y >. , v >. /\ ch ) }
12 df-oprab
 |-  { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps } = { t | E. x E. y E. z ( t = <. <. x , y >. , z >. /\ ps ) }
13 df-oprab
 |-  { <. <. w , y >. , v >. | ch } = { t | E. w E. y E. v ( t = <. <. w , y >. , v >. /\ ch ) }
14 11 12 13 3eqtr4i
 |-  { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps } = { <. <. w , y >. , v >. | ch }