Description: Lemma for currysetALT . (Contributed by BJ, 23-Sep-2023) This proof is intuitionistically valid. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Hypothesis | currysetlem2.def | |- X = { x | ( x e. x -> ph ) } |
|
Assertion | currysetlem2 | |- ( X e. V -> ( X e. X -> ph ) ) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | currysetlem2.def | |- X = { x | ( x e. x -> ph ) } |
|
2 | 1 | currysetlem1 | |- ( X e. V -> ( X e. X <-> ( X e. X -> ph ) ) ) |
3 | 2 | biimpd | |- ( X e. V -> ( X e. X -> ( X e. X -> ph ) ) ) |
4 | 3 | pm2.43d | |- ( X e. V -> ( X e. X -> ph ) ) |