Description: Lemma for currysetALT . (Contributed by BJ, 23-Sep-2023) This proof is intuitionistically valid. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypothesis | currysetlem2.def | |- X = { x | ( x e. x -> ph ) } | |
| Assertion | currysetlem2 | |- ( X e. V -> ( X e. X -> ph ) ) | 
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression | 
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | currysetlem2.def |  |-  X = { x | ( x e. x -> ph ) } | |
| 2 | 1 | currysetlem1 | |- ( X e. V -> ( X e. X <-> ( X e. X -> ph ) ) ) | 
| 3 | 2 | biimpd | |- ( X e. V -> ( X e. X -> ( X e. X -> ph ) ) ) | 
| 4 | 3 | pm2.43d | |- ( X e. V -> ( X e. X -> ph ) ) |