Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem bnj590

Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 . This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypothesis bnj590.1 ⊢ ψ ↔ ∀ i ∈ ω suc ⁡ i ∈ n → f ⁡ suc ⁡ i = ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ i pred y A R
Assertion bnj590 ⊢ B = suc ⁡ i ∧ ψ → i ∈ ω → B ∈ n → f ⁡ B = ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ i pred y A R

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 bnj590.1 ⊢ ψ ↔ ∀ i ∈ ω suc ⁡ i ∈ n → f ⁡ suc ⁡ i = ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ i pred y A R
2 rsp ⊢ ∀ i ∈ ω suc ⁡ i ∈ n → f ⁡ suc ⁡ i = ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ i pred y A R → i ∈ ω → suc ⁡ i ∈ n → f ⁡ suc ⁡ i = ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ i pred y A R
3 1 2 sylbi ⊢ ψ → i ∈ ω → suc ⁡ i ∈ n → f ⁡ suc ⁡ i = ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ i pred y A R
4 eleq1 ⊢ B = suc ⁡ i → B ∈ n ↔ suc ⁡ i ∈ n
5 fveqeq2 ⊢ B = suc ⁡ i → f ⁡ B = ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ i pred y A R ↔ f ⁡ suc ⁡ i = ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ i pred y A R
6 4 5 imbi12d ⊢ B = suc ⁡ i → B ∈ n → f ⁡ B = ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ i pred y A R ↔ suc ⁡ i ∈ n → f ⁡ suc ⁡ i = ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ i pred y A R
7 6 imbi2d ⊢ B = suc ⁡ i → i ∈ ω → B ∈ n → f ⁡ B = ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ i pred y A R ↔ i ∈ ω → suc ⁡ i ∈ n → f ⁡ suc ⁡ i = ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ i pred y A R
8 3 7 imbitrrid ⊢ B = suc ⁡ i → ψ → i ∈ ω → B ∈ n → f ⁡ B = ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ i pred y A R
9 8 imp ⊢ B = suc ⁡ i ∧ ψ → i ∈ ω → B ∈ n → f ⁡ B = ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ i pred y A R