Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem bnj958

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 . This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses bnj958.1 ⊢ C = ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ m pred y A R
bnj958.2 ⊢ G = f ∪ n C
Assertion bnj958 ⊢ G ⁡ i = f ⁡ i → ∀ y G ⁡ i = f ⁡ i

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 bnj958.1 ⊢ C = ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ m pred y A R
2 bnj958.2 ⊢ G = f ∪ n C
3 nfcv ⊢ Ⅎ _ y f
4 nfcv ⊢ Ⅎ _ y n
5 nfiu1 ⊢ Ⅎ _ y ⋃ y ∈ f ⁡ m pred y A R
6 1 5 nfcxfr ⊢ Ⅎ _ y C
7 4 6 nfop ⊢ Ⅎ _ y n C
8 7 nfsn ⊢ Ⅎ _ y n C
9 3 8 nfun ⊢ Ⅎ _ y f ∪ n C
10 2 9 nfcxfr ⊢ Ⅎ _ y G
11 nfcv ⊢ Ⅎ _ y i
12 10 11 nffv ⊢ Ⅎ _ y G ⁡ i
13 12 nfeq1 ⊢ Ⅎ y G ⁡ i = f ⁡ i
14 13 nf5ri ⊢ G ⁡ i = f ⁡ i → ∀ y G ⁡ i = f ⁡ i