Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem cnvref4

Description: Two ways to say that a relation is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Apr-2023)

Ref Expression
Assertion cnvref4 ⊢ Rel ⁡ R → R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ⊆ S ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ↔ R ⊆ S

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 dfrel6 ⊢ Rel ⁡ R ↔ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R = R
2 1 biimpi ⊢ Rel ⁡ R → R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R = R
3 2 dmeqd ⊢ Rel ⁡ R → dom ⁡ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R = dom ⁡ R
4 2 rneqd ⊢ Rel ⁡ R → ran ⁡ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R = ran ⁡ R
5 3 4 xpeq12d ⊢ Rel ⁡ R → dom ⁡ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R = dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R
6 5 ineq2d ⊢ Rel ⁡ R → S ∩ dom ⁡ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R = S ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R
7 6 sseq2d ⊢ Rel ⁡ R → R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ⊆ S ∩ dom ⁡ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ↔ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ⊆ S ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R
8 relxp ⊢ Rel ⁡ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R
9 relin2 ⊢ Rel ⁡ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R → Rel ⁡ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R
10 relssinxpdmrn ⊢ Rel ⁡ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R → R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ⊆ S ∩ dom ⁡ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ↔ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ⊆ S
11 8 9 10 mp2b ⊢ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ⊆ S ∩ dom ⁡ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ↔ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ⊆ S
12 2 sseq1d ⊢ Rel ⁡ R → R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ⊆ S ↔ R ⊆ S
13 11 12 bitrid ⊢ Rel ⁡ R → R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ⊆ S ∩ dom ⁡ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ↔ R ⊆ S
14 7 13 bitr3d ⊢ Rel ⁡ R → R ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ⊆ S ∩ dom ⁡ R × ran ⁡ R ↔ R ⊆ S