Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem ndmovord

Description: Elimination of redundant antecedents in an ordering law. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-1996)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses ndmov.1 ⊢ dom ⁡ F = S × S
ndmovord.4 ⊢ R ⊆ S × S
ndmovord.5 ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ S
ndmovord.6 ⊢ A ∈ S ∧ B ∈ S ∧ C ∈ S → A R B ↔ C F A R C F B
Assertion ndmovord ⊢ C ∈ S → A R B ↔ C F A R C F B

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 ndmov.1 ⊢ dom ⁡ F = S × S
2 ndmovord.4 ⊢ R ⊆ S × S
3 ndmovord.5 ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ S
4 ndmovord.6 ⊢ A ∈ S ∧ B ∈ S ∧ C ∈ S → A R B ↔ C F A R C F B
5 4 3expia ⊢ A ∈ S ∧ B ∈ S → C ∈ S → A R B ↔ C F A R C F B
6 2 brel ⊢ A R B → A ∈ S ∧ B ∈ S
7 2 brel ⊢ C F A R C F B → C F A ∈ S ∧ C F B ∈ S
8 1 3 ndmovrcl ⊢ C F A ∈ S → C ∈ S ∧ A ∈ S
9 8 simprd ⊢ C F A ∈ S → A ∈ S
10 1 3 ndmovrcl ⊢ C F B ∈ S → C ∈ S ∧ B ∈ S
11 10 simprd ⊢ C F B ∈ S → B ∈ S
12 9 11 anim12i ⊢ C F A ∈ S ∧ C F B ∈ S → A ∈ S ∧ B ∈ S
13 7 12 syl ⊢ C F A R C F B → A ∈ S ∧ B ∈ S
14 6 13 pm5.21ni ⊢ ¬ A ∈ S ∧ B ∈ S → A R B ↔ C F A R C F B
15 14 a1d ⊢ ¬ A ∈ S ∧ B ∈ S → C ∈ S → A R B ↔ C F A R C F B
16 5 15 pm2.61i ⊢ C ∈ S → A R B ↔ C F A R C F B