Description: Construct On using set recursion. When x e. On , the function F constructs the least ordinal greater than any of the elements of x , which is U. x for a limit ordinal and suc U. x for a successor ordinal.
For example, ( F{ 1o , 2o } ) = { U. { 1o , 2o } , suc U. { 1o , 2o } } = { 2o , 3o } which contains 3o , and ( F_om ) = { U.om , suc U. om } = {om , om +o 1o } , which contains _om . If we start with the empty set and keep applying F transfinitely many times, all ordinal numbers will be generated.
Any function F fulfilling lemmas onsetreclem2 and onsetreclem3 will recursively generate On ; for example, F = ( x e.V |-> suc suc U. x } ) also works. Whether this function or the function in the theorem is used, taking this theorem as a definition of On is unsatisfying because it relies on the different properties of limit and successor ordinals. A different approach could be to let F = ( x e. V |-> { y e. ~P x | Tr y } ) , based on dfon2 .
The proof of this theorem uses the dummy variable a rather than x to avoid a distinct variable condition between F and x . (Contributed by Emmett Weisz, 22-Jun-2021)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Hypothesis | onsetrec.1 | ||
Assertion | onsetrec |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | onsetrec.1 | ||
2 | eqid | ||
3 | 1 | onsetreclem2 | |
4 | 3 | ax-gen | |
5 | 4 | a1i | |
6 | 2 5 | setrec2v | |
7 | 6 | mptru | |
8 | vex | ||
9 | 8 | a1i | |
10 | id | ||
11 | 2 9 10 | setrec1 | |
12 | 1 | onsetreclem3 | |
13 | ssel | ||
14 | 11 12 13 | syl2im | |
15 | 14 | com12 | |
16 | 15 | rgen | |
17 | tfi | ||
18 | 7 16 17 | mp2an |