Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem rspcedvdw

Description: Version of rspcedvd where the implicit substitution hypothesis does not have an antecedent, which also avoids a disjoint variable condition on ph , x . (Contributed by SN, 20-Aug-2024)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses rspcedvdw.s ⊢ x = A → ψ ↔ χ
rspcedvdw.1 ⊢ φ → A ∈ B
rspcedvdw.2 ⊢ φ → χ
Assertion rspcedvdw ⊢ φ → ∃ x ∈ B ψ

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 rspcedvdw.s ⊢ x = A → ψ ↔ χ
2 rspcedvdw.1 ⊢ φ → A ∈ B
3 rspcedvdw.2 ⊢ φ → χ
4 1 rspcev ⊢ A ∈ B ∧ χ → ∃ x ∈ B ψ
5 2 3 4 syl2anc ⊢ φ → ∃ x ∈ B ψ